Advertisement
Review article| Volume 82, ISSUE 6, P1273-1290, December 2002

Fecal incontinence

      Fecal incontinence is a common problem not frequently discussed between patients and their physicians. More appropriately termed anal incontinence, it encompasses the inability to control the passage of flatus, liquid, or solid stool. What may seem like a minor inconvenience to the physician may be extremely distressing to the patient; the incontinent patient may experience social isolation, feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem, and sexual dysfunction in addition to the physical symptoms of recurrent genitourinary infections and perianal skin breakdown [
      • Sangwan Y.P
      • Coller J.A
      Fecal incontinence.
      ]. Community-based studies reveal a 2.2% prevalence of anal incontinence; 30% of these patients are over the age of 65, and 63% are female [
      • Nelson R
      • Norton N
      • Cautley E
      • et al.
      Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence.
      ]. By understanding the anatomic and physiologic mechanisms of fecal incontinence, the surgeon can appropriately evaluate and treat her patient with medical or surgical therapy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgical Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sangwan Y.P
        • Coller J.A
        Fecal incontinence.
        Surg Clin North Am. 1994; 74: 1377-1397
        • Nelson R
        • Norton N
        • Cautley E
        • et al.
        Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence.
        JAMA. 1995; 274: 559-561
        • Shafik A
        New concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. Ii. Anatomy of the levator ani muscle with special reference to puborectalis.
        Invest Urol. 1975; 13: 175-182
        • Mahieu P
        • Pringot J
        • Bodart P
        Defecography:.
        Gastrointest Radiol. 1984; 9: 247-251
        • Matzel K.E
        • Schmidt R.A
        • Tanagho E.A
        Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism. Implications for the use of neurostimulation.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1990; 33: 666-673
        • Sagar P.M
        • Pemberton J.H
        The assessment and treatment of anorectal incontinence.
        Adv Surg. 1996; 30: 1-20
        • Goligher J.C
        • Leacock A.G
        • Brossy J.-J
        The surgical anatomy of the anal canal.
        Br J Surg. 1955; 43: 51-61
        • Frenckner B
        • Euler C.V
        Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters.
        Gut. 1975; 16: 482-489
        • Read N.W
        • Haynes W.G
        • Bartolo D.C
        • et al.
        Use of anorectal manometry during rectal infusion of saline to investigate sphincter function in incontinent patients.
        Gastroenterology. 1983; 85: 105-113
      1. Schuster MM. Motor action of rectum and anal sphincters in continence and defecation. In: Code CF, editor. Handbook of physiology, vol. 4. Section 6: alimentary canal, Washington DC: American Physiological Society; 1968. p. 2121–40

        • Lubowski D.Z
        • Nicholls R.J
        • Swash M
        • et al.
        Neural control of internal anal sphincter function.
        Br J Surg. 1987; 74: 668-670
        • Frenckner B
        • Ihre T
        Influence of autonomic nerves on the internal and sphincter in man.
        Gut. 1976; 17: 306-312
        • Lestar B
        • Penninckx F
        • Kerremans R
        The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989; 4: 118-122
        • Schuster M.M
        The riddle of the sphincters.
        Gastroenterology. 1975; 69: 249-262
        • Schuster M.M
        • Mendeloff A.I
        Characteristics of rectosigmoid motor function: their relationship to continence, defecation and disease.
        in: Glass G.B.J Progress in gastroenterology. vol. 2. Grune and Stratton, New York1970: 200-205
        • Schuster M.M
        • Hookman P
        • Hendrix T.R
        • et al.
        Simultaneous manometric recording to internal and external anal sphincter reflexes.
        Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1965; 116: 79-88
        • Arhan P
        • Faverdin C
        • Persoz B
        • et al.
        Relationship between viscoelastic properties of the rectum and anal pressure in man.
        J Appl Physiol. 1976; 41: 677-682
        • Denis P
        • Colin R
        • Galmiche J.P
        • et al.
        Elastic properties of the rectal wall in normal adults and in the patients with ulcerative colitis.
        Gastroenterology. 1979; 77: 45-48
        • Varma J.S
        • Smith A.N
        • Busuttil A
        Correlation of clinical and manometric abnormalities of rectal function following chronic radiation injury.
        Br J Surg. 1985; 72: 875-878
        • Carmona J.A
        • Ortiz H
        • Perez-Cabanas I
        Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991; 6: 108-110
        • Parks A.G
        Anorectal incontinence.
        Proc R Soc Med. 1975; 68: 681-690
        • Duthie H.L
        • Gairns F.N
        Sensory nerve endings and sensation in the anal region of man.
        Br J Surg. 1960; 47: 585-595
        • Hancke E
        • Schurholz M
        Impaired rectal sensation in idiopathic faecal incontinence.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987; 2: 146-148
        • Jorge J.M
        • Wexner S.D
        Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36: 77-97
        • Devroede G
        • Arhan P
        • Schang J.C
        Orderly and disorderly fecal continence.
        in: Kodner I Fry R.D Roe J.P Colon, rectal, and anal surgery. CV Mosby, St. Louis1985: 40-62
        • Rogers J
        • Levy D.M
        • Henry M.M
        • et al.
        Pelvic floor neuropathy: a comparative study of diabetes mellitus and idiopathic faecal incontinence.
        Gut. 1988; 29: 756-761
        • Garcia-Aguilar J
        • Belmonte C
        • Wong W.D
        • et al.
        Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 723-729
        • Nielsen M.B
        • Rasmussen O.O
        • Pedersen J.F
        • et al.
        Risk of sphincter damage and anal incontinence after anal dilatation for fissure-in-ano. An endosonographic study.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1993; 36: 677-680
        • Garcia-Aguilar J
        • Belmonte C
        • Wong W.D
        • et al.
        Open vs. closed sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: long-term results.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 440-443
        • Sultan A.H
        • Kamm M.A
        • Nicholls R.J
        • et al.
        Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37: 1031-1033
        • Warshaw J.S
        Obstetric anal sphincter injury: incidence, risk factors, and repair.
        Sem Colon Rectal Surg. 2001; 12: 90-97
        • Shiono P
        • Klebanoff M.A
        • Carey J.C
        Midline episiotomies: more harm than good?.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 765-770
        • Low L.K
        • Seng J.S
        • Murtland T.L
        • et al.
        Clinician-specific episiotomy rates: impact on perineal outcomes.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000; 45: 87-93
        • Sultan A.H
        • Kamm M.A
        • Bartram C.I
        • et al.
        Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993; 43: 263-270
        • Allen R.E
        • Hosker G.L
        • Smith A.R
        • et al.
        Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 770-779
        • Sultan A.H
        • Kamm M.A
        • Talbot I.C
        • et al.
        Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically.
        Br J Surg. 1994; 81: 463-465
        • Sultan A.H
        • Nicholls R.J
        • Kamm M.A
        • et al.
        Anal endosonography and correlation with in vitro and in vivo anatomy.
        Br J Surg. 1993; 80: 508-511
        • Nielson M.B
        • Hauge C
        • Pederson J.F
        • et al.
        Endosonographic evaluation of patients with anal incontinence: findings and influence on surgical management.
        AJR. 1993; 80: 392-394
        • Deen K.I
        • Kumar D
        • Williams J.G
        • et al.
        The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study.
        Gut. 1993; 34: 685-688
        • Loening-Baucke V
        • Anuras S
        Anorectal manometry in healthy elderly subjects.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984; 32: 636-639
        • Loening-Baucke V
        • Anuras S
        Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 1985; 80: 50-53
        • McHugh S.M
        • Diamant N.E
        Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures. Contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1987; 32: 726-736
        • Meshkinpour H
        • Movahedi H
        • Welgan P
        Clinical value of anorectal manometry index in neurogenic fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40: 457-461
        • Suilleabhain C.B
        • Horgan A.F
        • McEnroe L
        • et al.
        The relationship of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency to squeeze pressure in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 666-671
        • Wald A
        • Tunuguntla A.K
        Anorectal sensorimotor dysfunction in fecal incontinence and diabetes mellitus. Modification with biofeedback therapy.
        N Engl J Med. 1984; 310: 1282-1287
        • Caruana B.J
        • Wald A
        • Hinds J.P
        • et al.
        Anorectal sensory and motor function in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Comparison between multiple sclerosis and diabetes mellitus.
        Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 465-470
        • De Medici A
        • Badiali D
        • Corazziari E
        • et al.
        Rectal sensitivity in chronic constipation.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1989; 34: 747-753
        • Wald A
        Biofeedback for neurogenic fecal incontinence: rectal sensation is a determinant of outcome.
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1983; 2: 302-306
        • Miner P.B
        • Donnelly T.C
        • Read N.W
        Investigation of mode of action of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1990; 35: 1291-1298
        • Latimer P.R
        • Campbell D
        • Kasperski J
        A components analysis of biofeedback in the treatment of fecal incontinence.
        Biofeedback Self Regul. 1984; 9: 311-324
        • Rao S.S
        • Welcher K.D
        • Happel J
        Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence?.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 1996; 91: 2360-2366
        • Roig J.V
        • Villoslada C
        • Lledo S
        • et al.
        Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence. Results of a prospective study.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38: 952-958
        • Gilliland R
        • Altomare D.F
        • Moreira Jr., H
        • et al.
        Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41: 1516-1522
        • Sangwan Y.P
        • Coller J.A
        • Barrett R.C
        • et al.
        Unilateral pudendal neuropathy. Impact on outcome of anal sphincter repair.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 686-689
        • Engel A.F
        • Kamm M.A
        • Sultan A.H
        • et al.
        Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma.
        Br J Surg. 1994; 84: 1231-1234
        • Chen A.S
        • Luchtefeld M.A
        • Senagore A.J
        • et al.
        Pudendal nerve latency. Does it predict outcome of anal sphincter repair?.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41: 1005-1009
        • Ternent C.A
        • Shashidharan M
        • Blatchford G.J
        • et al.
        Transanal ultrasound and anorectal physiology findings affecting continence after sphincteroplasty.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40: 462-467
        • Bartolo D.C
        • Jarratt J.A
        • Read M.G
        • et al.
        The role of partial denervation of the puborectalis in idiopathic faecal incontinence.
        Br J Surg. 1983; 70: 664-667
        • Liberman H
        • Faria J
        • Ternent C.A
        • et al.
        A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 1567-1574
        • Engel A.F
        • Kamm M.A
        • Hawley P.R
        Civilian and war injuries of the perineum and anal sphincters.
        Br J Surg. 1994; 81: 1069-1073
        • Bliss D.Z
        • Jung H.J
        • Savik K
        • et al.
        Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence.
        Nurs Res. 2001; 50: 203-213
        • Santoro G.A
        • Eitan B.Z
        • Pryde A
        • et al.
        Open study of low-dose amitriptyline in the treatment of patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 1681-1682
        • Read M
        • Read N.W
        • Barber D.C
        • et al.
        Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.
        Dig Dis Sci. 1982; 27: 807-814
        • Lembo T
        • Wright R.A
        • Bagby B
        • et al.
        Alosetron controls bowel urgency and provides global symptom improvement in women with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2001; 96: 2662-2670
        • Beck I.T
        Possible mechanisms for ischemic colitis during alosetron therapy.
        Gastroenterology. 2001; 121: 231-232
        • Carapeti E.A
        • Kamm M.A
        • Phillips R.K
        Randomized controlled trial of topical phenylephrine in the treatment of faecal incontinence.
        Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 38-42
        • King J.C
        • Currie D.M
        • Wright E
        Bowel training in spina bifida: importance of education, patient compliance, age, and anal reflexes.
        Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 243-247
        • Kirk P.M
        • King R.B
        • Temple R
        • et al.
        Long-term follow-up of bowel management after spinal cord injury.
        SCI Nurs. 1997; 14: 56-63
        • Kelly S.R
        • Shashidharan M
        • Borwell B
        • et al.
        The role of intestinal stoma in patients with spinal cord injury.
        Spinal Cord. 1999; 37: 211-214
        • DiPalma J.A
        • DeRidder P.H
        • Orlando R.C
        • et al.
        A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study of the safety and efficacy of a new polyethylene glycol laxative.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 446-450
        • Shandling B
        • Gilmour R.F
        The enema continence catheter in spina bifida: successful bowel management.
        J Pediatr Surg. 1987; 22: 271-273
        • Malone P.S
        • Ransley P.G
        • Kiely E.M
        Preliminary report: the antegrade colonic enama.
        Lancet. 1990; 336: 1217-1218
        • Heymen S
        • Jones K.R
        • Ringel Y
        • et al.
        Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence: a critical review.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 728-736
        • Jensen L.L
        • Lowry A.C
        Biofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincteroplasty.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1997; 40: 197-200
        • Ryn A.K
        • Morren G.L
        • Hallbook O
        • et al.
        Long-term results of electromyographic biofeedback training for fecal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 1262-1266
        • Parks A.G
        • McPartlin J.F
        Late repair of injuries of the anal sphincter.
        Proc R Soc Med. 1971; 64: 1187-1189
        • Engel A.F
        • Kamm M.A
        • Sultan A.H
        • et al.
        Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma.
        Br J Surg. 1994; 81: 1231-1234
        • Fleshman J.W
        • Peters W.R
        • Shemesh E.I
        • et al.
        Anal sphincter reconstruction: anterior overlapping muscle repair.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1991; 34: 739-743
        • Simmang C
        • Birnbaum E.H
        • Kodner I.J
        • et al.
        Anal sphincter reconstruction in the elderly: does advancing age affect outcome?.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1994; 37: 1065-1069
        • Young C.J
        • Mathur M.N
        • Eyers A.A
        • et al.
        Successful overlapping anal sphincter repair: relationship to patient age, neuropathy, and colostomy formation.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41: 344-349
        • Buie W.D
        • Lowry A.C
        • Rothenberger D.A
        • et al.
        Clinical rather than laboratory assessment predicts continence after anterior sphincteroplasty.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: 1255-1260
        • Wexner S.D
        • Marchetti F
        • Jagelman D.G
        The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1991; 34: 22-30
        • Oliveira L
        • Pfeifer J
        • Wexner S.D
        Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty.
        Br J Surg. 1996; 83: 502-505
        • Slade M.S
        • Goldberg S.M
        • Schottler J.L
        • et al.
        Sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1977; 20: 33-35
        • Hasegawa H
        • Yoshioka K
        • Keighley M.R
        Randomized trial of fecal diversion for sphincter repair.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43 ([discussion: 964–5]): 961-964
        • Nessim A
        • Wexner S.D
        • Agachan F
        • et al.
        Is bowel confinement necessary after anorectal reconstructive surgery? A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42: 16-23
        • Laurberg S
        • Swash M
        • Snooks S.J
        • et al.
        Neurologic cause of idiopathic incontinence.
        Arch Neurol. 1988; 45: 1250-1253
        • Londono-Schimmer E.E
        • Garcia-Duperly R
        • Nicholls R.J
        • et al.
        Overlapping anal sphincter repair for faecal incontinence due to sphincter trauma: five year follow-up functional results.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1994; 9: 110-113
        • Sitzler P.J
        • Thomson J.P
        Overlap repair of damaged anal sphincter. A single surgeon's series.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 1356-1360
        • Sultan A.H
        • Monga A.K
        • Kumar D
        • et al.
        Primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter rupture using the overlap technique.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 318-323
        • Davidson B.S
        • Simmons G.T
        • Williamson P.R
        • et al.
        Pelvic fractures associated with open perineal wounds: a survivable injury.
        J Trauma. 1993; 35: 36-39
        • Kudsk K.A
        • McQueen M.A
        • Voeller G.R
        • et al.
        Management of complex perineal soft-tissue injuries.
        J Trauma. 1990; 30 ([discussion: 1159–60]): 1155-1159
        • Critchlow J.F
        • Houlihan M.J
        • Landolt C.C
        • et al.
        Primary sphincter repair in anorectal trauma.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1985; 28: 945-947
        • Malouf A.J
        • Norton C.S
        • Engel A.F
        • et al.
        Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma.
        Lancet. 2000; 355: 260-265
        • Baeten C
        • Spaans F
        • Fluks A
        An implanted neuromuscular stimulator for fecal continence following previously implanted gracilis muscle. Report of a case.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31: 134-137
        • Baeten G.M.I
        • Geerdes B.P
        • Adang E.M.M
        • et al.
        Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence.
        NEJM. 1995; 332: 1600-1605
        • Madoff R.D
        • Rosen H.R
        • Baeten C.G
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial.
        Gastroenterology. 1999; 116: 549-556
        • Altomare D.F
        • Rinaldi M
        • Pannarale O.C
        • et al.
        Electrostimulated gracilis neosphincter for faecal incontinence and in total anorectal reconstruction: still an experimental procedure?.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997; 12: 308-312
        • Rongen M.J
        • Dekker F.A
        • Geerdes B.P
        • et al.
        Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after miles resection–feasible, but with a high morbidity.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1999; 42 ([discussion: 781]): 776-780
        • Christiansen J
        • Lorentzen M
        Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence.
        Lancet. 1987; 2: 244-245
        • Altomare D.F
        • Dodi G
        • La Torre F
        • et al.
        Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence.
        Br J Surg. 2001; 88: 1481-1486
        • O'Brien P.E
        • Skinner S
        Restoring control: the acticon neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 1213-1216
        • Christiansen J
        • Rasmussen O.O
        • Lindorff-Larsen K
        Long-term results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence.
        Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 45-48
        • Lehur P.A
        • Glemain P
        • Bruley des Varannes S
        • et al.
        Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinence. A single institution report.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998; 13: 88-92
        • Lehur P.A
        • Roig J.V
        • Duinslaeger M
        Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 1100-1106
        • Wong W.D
        • Jensen L.L
        • Bartolo D.C
        • et al.
        Artificial anal sphincter.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1996; 39: 1345-1351
        • The ABS Clinical Trial Group
        The artificial bowel sphincter-results of a multicenter clinical trial.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44: A5-A26
        • Matzel K.E
        • Stadelmaier U
        • Hohenfellner M
        • et al.
        Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence.
        Lancet. 1995; 346: 1124-1127
        • Vaizey C.J
        • Kamm M.A
        • Turner I.C
        • et al.
        Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence.
        Gut. 1999; 44: 407-412