Advertisement

Administrative and Registry Databases for Patient Safety Tracking and Quality Improvement

  • Author Footnotes
    1 BCB and CPF acted as co-first authors on this publication.
    Brian C. Brajcich
    Footnotes
    1 BCB and CPF acted as co-first authors on this publication.
    Affiliations
    Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, 633 North St. Clair Street, 23Road Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

    Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 BCB and CPF acted as co-first authors on this publication.
    Chelsea P. Fischer
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author:
    Footnotes
    1 BCB and CPF acted as co-first authors on this publication.
    Affiliations
    Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, 633 North St. Clair Street, 23Road Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

    Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Clifford Y. Ko
    Affiliations
    Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, 633 North St. Clair Street, 23Road Floor, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

    UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 BCB and CPF acted as co-first authors on this publication.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgical Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Neuhauser D.
        Ernest Amory Codman MD.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11: 104-105
        • Rodkey G.V.
        • Itani K.M.
        Evaluation of healthcare quality: a tale of three giants.
        Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S3-S8
        • Codman E.A.
        The classic: a study in hospital efficiency: as demonstrated by the case report of first five years of private hospital.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 1778-1783
        • Medicare Cf
        • Services M.
        CMS. gov.
        Author, Baltimore (MD)2018
        • Vizient I.
        Vizient.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 22, 2020)
        • Health P.
        Premier health.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 22, 2020)
      1. American College of Surgeons. About ACS NSQIP.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 15, 2020)
      2. The American College of Surgeons. National cancer database.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 15, 2020)
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Stewart A.K.
        • Winchester D.P.
        • et al.
        The national cancer data base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15: 683-690
      3. Association NCR. Council on Certification. Available at: https://www.ncra-usa.org/CTR. Accessed April 15, 2020.

        • Itani K.M.
        Fifteen years of the national surgical quality improvement program in review.
        Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S9-S18
        • Fink A.S.
        Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes.
        Am J Surg. 2009; 198: S28-S35
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Henderson W.G.
        • Daley J.
        • et al.
        Successful implementation of the department of veterans affairs' national surgical quality improvement program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study.
        Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 329-336
      4. Society for vascular surgery. Vascular quality initiative.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 15 , 2020)
      5. The society of thoracic surgeons. STS National database.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April, 15 2020)
        • Ali-Mucheru M.N.
        • Seville M.T.
        • Miller V.
        • et al.
        Postoperative surgical site infections: understanding the discordance between surveillance systems.
        Ann Surg. 2020; 271: 94-99
        • Allen M.S.
        • Blackmon S.
        • Nichols F.C.
        • et al.
        Comparison of two national databases for general thoracic surgery.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100: 1155-1162
        • Awad M.I.
        • Shuman A.G.
        • Montero P.H.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of administrative and clinical registry data in reporting postoperative complications after surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
        Head Neck. 2015; 37: 851-861
        • Bedard N.A.
        • Pugely A.J.
        • McHugh M.A.
        • et al.
        Big data and total hip arthroplasty: how do large databases compare?.
        J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33: 41-45.e43
        • Bensley R.P.
        • Yoshida S.
        • Lo R.C.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of administrative data versus clinical data to evaluate carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.
        J Vasc Surg. 2013; 58: 412-419
        • Best W.R.
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Phelan M.
        • et al.
        Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the department of veterans affairs national surgical quality improvement program.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 257-266
        • Borzecki A.M.
        • Cevasco M.
        • Mull H.
        • et al.
        Improving the identification of postoperative wound dehiscence missed by the Patient Safety Indicator algorithm.
        Am J Surg. 2013; 205: 674-680
        • Enomoto L.M.
        • Hollenbeak C.S.
        • Bhayani N.H.
        • et al.
        Measuring surgical quality: a national clinical registry versus administrative claims data.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18: 1416-1422
        • Koch C.G.
        • Li L.
        • Hixson E.
        • et al.
        What are the real rates of postoperative complications: elucidating inconsistencies between administrative and clinical data sources.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 798-805
        • Kulaylat A.N.
        • Engbrecht B.W.
        • Rocourt D.V.
        • et al.
        Measuring surgical site infections in children: comparing clinical, electronic, and administrative data.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 222: 823-830
        • Lawson E.H.
        • Louie R.
        • Zingmond D.S.
        • et al.
        A comparison of clinical registry versus administrative claims data for reporting of 30-day surgical complications.
        Ann Surg. 2012; 256: 973-981
        • Patterson J.T.
        • Sing D.
        • Hansen E.N.
        • et al.
        The James A. Rand Young Investigator's award: administrative claims vs surgical registry: capturing outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.
        J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32: S11-S17
        • Steinberg S.M.
        • Popa M.R.
        • Michalek J.A.
        • et al.
        Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
        Surgery. 2008; 144: 662-669
        • Davenport D.L.
        • Holsapple C.W.
        • Conigliaro J.
        Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the university healthsystem consortium clinical database and the national surgical quality improvement program data set.
        Am J Med Qual. 2009; 24: 395-402
        • Lawson E.H.
        • Zingmond D.S.
        • Hall B.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison between clinical registry and medicare claims data on the classification of hospital quality of surgical care.
        Ann Surg. 2015; 261: 290-296
        • Hall B.L.
        • Hirbe M.
        • Waterman B.
        • et al.
        Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: 767-777
        • O'Brien S.M.
        • Cohen D.J.
        • Rumsfeld J.S.
        • et al.
        Variation in hospital risk–adjusted mortality rates following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States: a report from the society of thoracic surgeons/American college of cardiology transcatheter valve therapy registry.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016; 9: 560-565
        • Beaulieu P.A.
        • Higgins J.H.
        • Dacey L.J.
        • et al.
        Transforming administrative data into real-time information in the Department of Surgery.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2010; 19: 399-404
        • Lawson E.H.
        • Louie R.
        • Zingmond D.S.
        • et al.
        Using both clinical registry and administrative claims data to measure risk-adjusted surgical outcomes.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: 50-57
        • Khuri S.F.
        • Daley J.
        • Henderson W.G.
        The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the department of veterans affairs.
        Arch Surg. 2002; 137: 20-27
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • et al.
        Optimizing ACS NSQIP modeling for evaluation of surgical quality and risk: patient risk adjustment, procedure mix adjustment, shrinkage adjustment, and surgical focus.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 217: 336-346.e331.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • Hall B.L.
        • Hart A.J.
        • et al.
        The American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program: achieving better and safer surgery.
        Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015; 41: 199-204
        • ClinicalTrials.gov
        Does cefoxitin or piperacillin-tazobactam prevent postoperative surgical site infections after pancreatoduodenectomy?.
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 15, 2020)
        • Campbell D.A.
        • Englesbe M.J.
        • Kubus J.J.
        • et al.
        Accelerating the pace of surgical quality improvement: the power of hospital collaboration.
        Arch Surg. 2010; 145: 985-991
        • Guillamondegui O.D.
        • Gunter O.L.
        • Hines L.
        • et al.
        Using the national surgical quality improvement program and the Tennessee surgical quality collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 709-714
        • Vu J.V.
        • Collins S.D.
        • Seese E.
        • et al.
        Evidence that a regional surgical collaborative can transform care: surgical site infection prevention practices for colectomy in Michigan.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2018; 226: 91-99
        • Vu J.V.
        • Englesbe M.J.
        • Sheetz K.H.
        Databases for surgical health services research: collaborative quality improvement programs.
        Surgery. 2018; 164: 3-5
        • Hall B.L.
        • Hamilton B.H.
        • Richards K.
        • et al.
        Does surgical quality improve in the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
        Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 363-376
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Liu Y.
        • Ko C.Y.
        • et al.
        Improved surgical outcomes for ACS NSQIP hospitals over time: evaluation of hospital cohorts with up to 8 years of participation.
        Ann Surg. 2016; 263: 267-273
      6. Commission on Cancer. Optimal Resources for cancer care: 2020 standards. January 2020. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards/2020. Accessed April 15, 2020.

        • McDonald K.M.
        • Romano P.S.
        • Geppert J.
        • et al.
        Measures of patient safety based on hospital administrative data-the patient safety indicators.
        2002 (AHRQ Technical Reviews and Summaries. 2002. Report No.: 02-0038)
        • Miller M.R.
        • Elixhauser A.
        • Zhan C.
        • et al.
        Patient safety indicators: using administrative data to identify potential patient safety concerns.
        Health Serv Res. 2001; 36: 110
        • Kaafarani H.M.
        • Borzecki A.M.
        • Itani K.M.
        • et al.
        Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212: 924-934
        • Rivard P.E.
        • Luther S.L.
        • Christiansen C.L.
        • et al.
        Using patient safety indicators to estimate the impact of potential adverse events on outcomes.
        Med Care Res Rev. 2008; 65: 67-87
      7. CMS. Hospital readmissions reduction program (HRRP).
        (Available at:) (Accessed April 17, 2020)
        • Borza T.
        • Oerline M.K.
        • Skolarus T.A.
        • et al.
        Association of the hospital readmissions reduction program with surgical readmissions.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 243-250
        • Zuckerman R.B.
        • Sheingold S.H.
        • Orav E.J.
        • et al.
        Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1543-1551
        • Birdas T.J.
        • Rozycki G.F.
        • Dunnington G.L.
        • et al.
        “Show me the data”: A recipe for quality improvement success in an academic surgical department.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2019; 228: 368-373
        • Shiloach M.
        • Frencher Jr., S.K.
        • Steeger J.E.
        • et al.
        Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 6-16
        • Burgess N.
        • Radnor Z.
        Evaluating Lean in healthcare.
        Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013; 26: 220-235
        • De Koning H.
        • Verver J.P.
        • van den Heuvel J.
        • et al.
        Lean six sigma in healthcare.
        J Healthc Qual. 2006; 28: 4-11
        • Kim C.S.
        • Spahlinger D.A.
        • Kin J.M.
        • et al.
        Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker?.
        J Hosp Med. 2006; 1: 191-199
        • Mazzocato P.
        • Savage C.
        • Brommels M.
        • et al.
        Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2010; 19: 376-382
        • Taylor M.J.
        • McNicholas C.
        • Nicolay C.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of the application of the plan–do–study–act method to improve quality in healthcare.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23: 290-298
        • Odell D.D.
        • Quinn C.M.
        • Matulewicz R.S.
        • et al.
        Association between hospital safety culture and surgical outcomes in a statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2019; 229: 175-183
        • Obermeyer Z.
        • Emanuel E.J.
        Predicting the future - big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1216-1219
        • Appelboom G.
        • Camacho E.
        • Abraham M.E.
        • et al.
        Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring.
        Arch Public Health. 2014; 72: 28
        • Group. F-NBW
        BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) resource. Silver spring (MD): food and drug administration.
        National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (MD)2016