Review Article| Volume 102, ISSUE 3, P449-464, June 2022

Management of Coronary Artery Disease

Published:April 21, 2022DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Surgical Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Underlying cause of death 1999-2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
        (Available at:) (Accessed 31 August 2021)
        • Kolesov V.I.
        • Potashov L.V.
        [Surgery of coronary arteries].
        Eksp Khir Anesteziol. 1965; 10 (Operatsii na venechnykh arteriiakh serdtsa): 3-8
        • Kolesov V.I.
        [Initial experience in the treatment of stenocardia by the formation of coronary-systemic vascular anastomoses].
        Kardiologiia. 1967; 7 (Pervyi opyt lecheniia stenokardii nalozheniem venechno-sistemnykh sosudistykh soust'ev): 20-25
        • Gruntzig A.
        Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis.
        Lancet. 1978; 1: 263
        • Sigwart U.
        • Puel J.
        • Mirkovitch V.
        • et al.
        Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty.
        N Engl J Med. 1987; 316: 701-706
        • Sousa J.E.
        • Costa M.A.
        • Abizaid A.
        • et al.
        Lack of neointimal proliferation after implantation of sirolimus-coated stents in human coronary arteries: a quantitative coronary angiography and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound study.
        Circulation. 2001; 103: 192-195
        • Knuuti J.
        • Wijns W.
        • Saraste A.
        • et al.
        2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
        Eur Heart J. 2020; 41: 407-477
        • Anderson J.L.
        • Morrow D.A.
        Acute Myocardial Infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 2053-2064
        • Amsterdam E.A.
        • Wenger N.K.
        • Brindis R.G.
        • et al.
        2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: e139-e228
        • Katz D.
        • Gavin M.C.
        Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.
        Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171: ITC17-ITC32
        • Fihn S.D.
        • Gardin J.M.
        • Abrams J.
        • et al.
        2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: e44-e164
        • Myers J.
        • Prakash M.
        • Froelicher V.
        • et al.
        Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 793-801
        • Knuuti J.
        • Ballo H.
        • Juarez-Orozco L.E.
        • et al.
        The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: a meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability.
        Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 3322-3330
        • Wohlgelernter D.
        • Cleman M.
        • Highman H.A.
        • et al.
        Regional myocardial dysfunction during coronary angioplasty: evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography and 12 lead electrocardiography.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986; 7: 1245-1254
        • Hauser A.M.
        • Gangadharan V.
        • Ramos R.G.
        • et al.
        Sequence of mechanical, electrocardiographic and clinical effects of repeated coronary artery occlusion in human beings: echocardiographic observations during coronary angioplasty.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5: 193-197
        • Fleischmann K.E.
        • Hunink M.G.
        • Kuntz K.M.
        • et al.
        Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance.
        JAMA. 1998; 280: 913-920
        • Imran M.B.
        • Palinkas A.
        • Picano E.
        Head-to-head comparison of dipyridamole echocardiography and stress perfusion scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Comparison between stress echo and scintigraphy.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2003; 19: 23-28
        • Picano E.
        • Molinaro S.
        • Pasanisi E.
        The diagnostic accuracy of pharmacological stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
        Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008; 6: 30
        • Mc Ardle B.A.
        • Dowsley T.F.
        • deKemp R.A.
        • et al.
        Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1828-1837
        • Tarantini G.
        • Cacciavillani L.
        • Corbetti F.
        • et al.
        Duration of ischemia is a major determinant of transmurality and severe microvascular obstruction after primary angioplasty: a study performed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 1229-1235
        • Pijls N.H.
        • De Bruyne B.
        • Peels K.
        • et al.
        Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses.
        N Engl J Med. 1996; 334: 1703-1708
        • Fihn S.D.
        • Blankenship J.C.
        • Alexander K.P.
        • et al.
        2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 1929-1949
        • Hillis L.D.
        • Smith P.K.
        • Anderson J.L.
        • et al.
        2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: e123-e210
        • Levine G.N.
        • Bates E.R.
        • Bittl J.A.
        • et al.
        2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68: 1082-1115
        • Holmes Jr., D.R.
        • Rich J.B.
        • Zoghbi W.A.
        • et al.
        The heart team of cardiovascular care.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 903-907
        • Tsang M.B.
        • Schwalm J.D.
        • Gandhi S.
        • et al.
        Comparison of heart team vs interventional cardiologist recommendations for the treatment of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3: e2012749
        • Serruys P.W.
        • Morice M.C.
        • Kappetein A.P.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 961-972
        • Stone G.W.
        • Sabik J.F.
        • Serruys P.W.
        • et al.
        Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2223-2235
        • Head S.J.
        • Milojevic M.
        • Daemen J.
        • et al.
        Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 939-948
        • Davierwala P.M.
        • Gao C.
        • Thuijs D.
        • et al.
        Single or multiple arterial bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.
        Eur Heart J. 2021;
        • Rocha R.V.
        • Tam D.Y.
        • Karkhanis R.
        • et al.
        Multiple arterial grafting is associated with better outcomes for coronary artery bypass grafting patients.
        Circ. 2018; 138: 2081-2090
        • Esper R.B.
        • Farkouh M.E.
        • Ribeiro E.E.
        • et al.
        SYNTAX Score in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary revascularization in the FREEDOM trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2826-2837
        • Peterson M.D.
        • Borger M.A.
        • Rao V.
        • et al.
        Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 1314-1319
        • Sa M.P.
        • Ferraz P.E.
        • Escobar R.R.
        • et al.
        Skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery and risk of sternal wound infection after coronary bypass surgery: meta-analysis and meta-regression of 4817 patients.
        Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 16: 849-857
        • Ding W.J.
        • Ji Q.
        • Shi Y.Q.
        • et al.
        Incidence of deep sternal wound infection in diabetic patients undergoing off-pump skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting.
        Cardiology. 2016; 133: 111-118
        • Tatoulis J.
        • Buxton B.F.
        • Fuller J.A.
        The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit--5,766 patients and 991 angiograms.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92 ([discussion 15-17]): 9-15
        • Tatoulis J.
        • Buxton B.F.
        • Fuller J.A.
        Results of 1,454 free right internal thoracic artery-to-coronary artery grafts.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 64 ([discussion: 1268-1269]): 1263-1268
        • Sabik 3rd, J.F.
        • Stockins A.
        • Nowicki E.R.
        • et al.
        Does location of the second internal thoracic artery graft influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting?.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: S210-S215
        • Gaudino M.
        • Audisio K.
        • Rahouma M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes of skeletonized vs pedicled internal thoracic artery harvesting techniques in the arterial revascularization trial.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2021;
        • Sabik 3rd, J.F.
        • Lytle B.W.
        • Blackstone E.H.
        • et al.
        Comparison of saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery graft patency by coronary system.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79 ([discussion: 544-551]): 544-551
        • Vural K.M.
        • Sener E.
        • Tasdemir O.
        Long-term patency of sequential and individual saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001; 19: 140-144
        • Goldman S.
        • Zadina K.
        • Moritz T.
        • et al.
        Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 2149-2156
        • Tian M.
        • Wang X.
        • Sun H.
        • et al.
        No-touch versus conventional vein harvesting techniques at 12 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: multicenter randomized, controlled trial.
        Circulation. 2021;
        • Kim K.B.
        • Hwang H.Y.
        • Hahn S.
        • et al.
        A randomized comparison of the Saphenous Vein Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery as a Y-Composite Graft (SAVE RITA) trial: one-year angiographic results and mid-term clinical outcomes.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148 ([discussion: 907-908]): 901-907
        • Kim M.S.
        • Hwang H.Y.
        • Kim J.S.
        • et al.
        Saphenous vein versus right internal thoracic artery as a Y-composite graft: five-year angiographic and clinical results of a randomized trial.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 1424-1433.e1
        • Ganyukov V.
        • Kochergin N.
        • Shilov A.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of surgical vs. percutaneous vs. hybrid revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease: residual myocardial ischemia and clinical outcomes at one year-hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS).
        J Interv Cardiol. 2020; 2020: 5458064
        • Basman C.
        • Hemli J.M.
        • Kim M.C.
        • et al.
        Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: Hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary revascularization methods.
        J Card Surg. 2020; 35: 2710-2718
        • Elbadawi A.
        • Hamed M.
        • Elgendy I.Y.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in the United States.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9: e016282
        • Gallo M.
        • Trivedi J.R.
        • Monreal G.
        • et al.
        Risk factors and outcomes in redo coronary artery Bypass Grafting.
        Heart Lung Circ. 2020; 29: 384-389
        • Shroyer A.L.
        • Grover F.L.
        • Hattler B.
        • et al.
        On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1827-1837
        • Lamy A.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Prabhakaran D.
        • et al.
        Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1179-1188
        • Lamy A.
        • Devereaux P.J.
        • Prabhakaran D.
        • et al.
        Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 2359-2368
        • Shroyer A.L.
        • Hattler B.
        • Wagner T.H.
        • et al.
        Five-year outcomes after on-pump and off-pump coronary-artery bypass.
        N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 623-632
        • Diegeler A.
        • Borgermann J.
        • Kappert U.
        • et al.
        Five-Year Outcome After Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: 1865-1871
        • Polomsky M.
        • He X.
        • O'Brien S.M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Impact of preoperative risk.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: 1193-1198
        • Taggart D.P.
        • Gaudino M.F.
        • Gerry S.
        • et al.
        Ten-year outcomes after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from the Arterial Revascularization Trial.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 162: 591-599.e8
        • Benedetto U.
        • Raja S.G.
        • Soliman R.F.
        • et al.
        Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass improves late survival compared with drug-eluting stents in isolated proximal left anterior descending artery disease: a 10-year follow-up, single-center, propensity score analysis.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148: 1316-1322
        • Kulik A.
        • Ruel M.
        • Jneid H.
        • et al.
        Secondary prevention after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circ. 2015; 131: 927-964