Review Article| Volume 102, ISSUE 6, P1031-1041, December 2022

Management of Radiographic Lesions of the Breast


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Surgical Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Strax P.
        • Venet L.
        • Shapiro S.
        Value of mammography in reduction of mortality from breast cancer in mass screening.
        Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1973; 117: 686-689
        • Scatliff J.H.
        • Morris P.J.
        From Roentgen to magnetic resonance imaging: the history of medical imaging.
        N C Med J. 2014; 75: 111-113
      1. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present B N joe.
        Edward Sickles Radiol. 2014; 273
        • Pisano E.D.
        • Gatsonis C.
        • Hendrick E.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1773-1783
        • Hendrick R.E.
        Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
        Radiology. 2010; 257: 246-253
        • Dershaw D.D.
        • Fleischman R.C.
        • Liberman L.
        • et al.
        Use of digital mammography in needle localization procedures.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 559-562
        • Gao Y.
        • Moy L.
        • Heller S.
        Digital breast tomosynthesis: update on technology, evidence, and clinical practice.
        Radiographics. 2021; 41: 321-337
        • Chong A.
        • Weinstein S.P.
        • McDonald E.S.
        • et al.
        Digital breast tomosynthesis: concepts and clinical practice.
        Radiology. 2019; 292: 1-14
        • Taylor K.J.
        • Merritt C.
        • Piccoli C.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound as a complement to mammography and breast examination to characterize breast masses.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 19-26
        • Berg W.A.
        • Blume J.D.
        • Cormack J.B.
        • et al.
        Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2151-2163
        • Berg W.A.
        • Blume J.D.
        • Cormack J.B.
        • et al.
        Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization.
        Radiology. 2006; 241: 355-365
        • Price E.R.
        • Hargreaves J.
        • Lipson J.A.
        • et al.
        The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation.
        Radiology. 2013; 269: 887-892
        • Butler R.S.
        • Hooley R.J.
        Screening breast ultrasound:update after 10 years of breast density notification laws.
        AJR. 2020; 214: 1424-1435
        • Kolb T.M.
        • Lichy J.
        • Newhouse J.H.
        Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
        Radiology. 2002; 225: 165-175
        • Berg W.A.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Lehrer D.
        • et al.
        Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 1394-1404
        • Harvey J.A.
        • Yaffe M.J.
        • D’Orsi C.
        • et al.
        Density and breast cancer risk.
        Radiology. 2013; 267: 657-658
        • Yi A.
        • Jang M.
        • Yim D.
        • et al.
        Addition of screening breast US to digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.
        Radiology. 2021; 298: 568-575
        • Lee C.H.
        • Dershaw D.D.
        • Kopans D.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 18-27
        • Raber B.
        • Bea V.J.
        • Bedrosian I.
        How Does MR Imaging Help Care for My Breast Cancer Patient? Perspective of a Surgical Oncologist.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2018; 26: 281-288
        • Reig B.
        • Lewin A.A.
        • Du L.
        • et al.
        Breast MRI for Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.
        Radiographics. 2021; 41: 665-679
        • Brenner R.J.
        Evaluation of breast silicone implants.
        Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013; 21: 547-560
        • Jochelson M.S.
        • Lobbes M.B.I.
        Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art.
        Radiology. 2021; 299: 36-48
        • Berg W.A.
        Nuclear breast imaging: clinical results and future directions.
        JNM. 2016; 57: 46S-52S
        • Kuhl C.K.
        • Schrading S.
        • Strobel K.
        • et al.
        Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 2304-2310
        • Zhu Y.
        • O’Connell A.M.
        • Yue M.
        • et al.
        Dedicated breast CT: state of the art—part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects.
        Eur Radiol. 2022; 32: 1579-1589
        • Kopans D.B.
        Standardized mammography reporting.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 257-264
        • Burnside E.S.
        • Sickles E.A.
        • Bassett L.W.
        • et al.
        The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6 (51): 851-860
        • Sickles E.A.
        Periodic mam) [ACR BI-RADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system.
        American College of Radiology, Reston (VA)2013
        • Liberman L.
        Centennial dissertation. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1191-1199
        • Portnow L.H.
        • Thornton C.M.
        • Milch H.S.
        • et al.
        Biopsy marker standardization: what’s in a name?.
        AJR. 2019; 212: 1400-1405