Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Surgical ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69: 184-210
- Cancer statistics, 2022.CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72: 7-33
- Radiation Dose to Adults from Common Imaging Examinations.(ACR Available at:)
- Calculate Your Radiation Dose.(EPA Available at:)
- Fujita H. Hara T. Muramatsu C. Digital breast tomosynthesis: image quality and dose Saving of the Synthesized image. Breast imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture notes in computer Science. 8539. Springer, Cham2014https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_22
- ACR BI-RADS Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring.in: D'Orsi C.J. Sickles E.A. Mendelson E.B. ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA2013 ([Google Scholar])
- Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 210: 241-245
- The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned?.Radiol Clin North Am. 2004; 42: 793-v
- Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs.Breast J. 2015; 21: 13-20
- Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society [published correction appears in JAMA.JAMA. 2015; 314 (1406): 1599-1614
- Screening for Breast Cancer.Med Clin North Am. 2020; 104: 1007-1021
- The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.J Med Screen. 2012; 19: 14-25
- Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer [published correction appears in.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107: dju404
- Breast cancer mortality in relation to receipt of screening mammography: a case-control study in Saskatchewan, Canada.Cancer Causes Control. 2015; 26: 231-237
- Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening With Risk-Based and Universal Mammography Screening Compared With Clinical Breast Examination: A Propensity Score Analysis of 1 429 890 Taiwanese Women.JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2: 915-921
- Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.Br J Cancer. 2017; 116: 828-839
- The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of trend studies.J Med Screen. 2012; 19: 26-32
- Mammography Screening Guideline Controversies: Opportunities to Improve Patient Engagement in Screening.J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: 633-636
- Mammography before diagnosis among women age 80 years and older with breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 2482-2488
- New American Cancer Society process for creating trustworthy cancer screening guidelines.JAMA. 2011; 306: 2495-2499
- Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1: 1069-1077
- Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 21-35
- Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164 ([published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 20;169(10):740]): 256-267
- Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review.J Med Screen. 2012; 19: 42-56
- Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.(Available at URL:) (Accessed July 09, 2020)
- Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155 ([published correction appears in Ann Intern Med. 2014 May 6;160(9):658]): 481-492
- Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 954-961
- National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.Radiology. 2017; 283: 49-58
- Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164: 226-235
- Benefits of screening mammography.JAMA. 2010; 303: 168-169
- The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 790-796
- Satisfaction With Same-Day-Read Baseline Mammography.J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16: 321-326
- Impact of a Same-Day Breast Biopsy Program on Disparities in Time to Biopsy.J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16: 1554-1560
- Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.Radiology. 2019; 290: 52-58
NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2021 Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.
NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022 Breast Cancer Risk Reduction.
- The genetic attributable risk of breast and ovarian cancer.Cancer. 1996; 77: 2318-2324
- The American Society of Breast Surgeons website. Position statement on screening mammography.(Available at:)
- Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: 408-414
- American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57 ([published correction appears in CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 May-Jun;57(3):185]): 75-89
- Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1159-1169
- Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: interactions of percent density, absolute dense, and non-dense areas with breast cancer risk factors.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 150: 181-189
- DenseBreast-Info. Legislation and regulation.(Available at) (Google Scholar)
- Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 583-589
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density.J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: S456-S473
- Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015; 24: 93-99
- Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.Radiology. 2013; 267: 47-56
- Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.JAMA. 2014; 311: 2499-2507
- Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.JAMA. 2016; 315: 1784-1786
- Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015; 12: 377-379
- Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.JAMA. 2008; 299 ([published correction appears in JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1482]): 2151-2163
- Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2016; 387: 341-348
- The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.Breast J. 2015; 21: 175-180
- Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 8469-8476
- Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.Radiology. 2016; 280: 716-722
- Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue.N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 2091-2102
- Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.Radiology. 2011; 258: 106-118
- Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204: 241-251
- Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening With Molecular Breast Imaging for Women With Dense Breast Tissue.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207: 450-457
- Let's Get Real about Molecular Breast Imaging and Radiation Risk.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2019; 1 (Published 2019 Sep 27): e190070
- Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.Radiology. 2021; 299: 36-48https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021201948
- Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.Radiology. 2019; 293: 81-88
- Application of Abbreviated Protocol of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Screening in Dense Breast Tissue.Acad Radiol. 2017; 24: 316-320
- Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.JAMA. 2020; 323 ([published correction appears in JAMA. 2020 Mar 24;323(12):1194]): 746-756
- Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes among Hispanic Black and Hispanic White women.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 134: 1297-1304
- Race/Ethnicity and Age Distribution of Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the United States.JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 594-595
- Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 1280-1288
- Imaging Health and Radiology Care of Transgender Patients: A Call to Build Evidence-Based Best Practices.J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 475-480
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 17, 2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
