Advertisement

Novel Approaches to Breast Reconstruction

Published:October 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2022.08.008

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Surgical Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Stolier A.J.
        • Levine E.A.
        Reducing the risk of nipple necrosis: technical observations in 340 nipple-sparing mastectomies.
        Breast J. 2013; 19: 173-179
        • McCarthy C.M.
        • Mehrara B.J.
        • Riedel E.
        • al at
        Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1886-1892
        • Nava M.B.
        • Cortinovis U.
        • Ottolenghi J.
        • et al.
        Skin-reducing mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 603-610
        • Howard M.A.
        • Sisco M.
        • Yao K.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114: 416-422
        • Salibian A.H.
        • Harness J.K.
        • Mowlds D.S.
        Primary buttonhole mastopexy and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a preliminary report.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 388-395
        • Aliotta R.E.
        • Scomacao I.
        • Duraes E.F.R.
        • et al.
        Pushing the envelope: skin-only mastopexy in single-stage nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 38-45
        • Doren E.L.
        • Kuykendall L.V.E.
        • Lopez J.J.
        • et al.
        Free nipple grafting: an alternative for patients ineligible for nipple-sparing mastectomy?.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2014; 72: S112-S115
        • Kim E.K.
        • Cho J.M.
        • Lee J.W.
        Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate nipple graft for large, ptotic breast.
        J Breast Cancer. 2019; 22: 641-646
        • Spear S.L.
        • Rottman S.J.
        • Seiboth L.A.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 572-581
        • Momeni A.
        • Kanchwala S.
        • Sbitany H.
        Oncoplastic procedures in preparation for nipple-sparing mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction: controlling the breast envelope.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 914-920
        • Salibian A.A.
        • Frey J.D.
        • Karp N.S.
        • et al.
        Does staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy decrease complications? A matched cohort study between staged and nonstaged techniques.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 1023-1032
        • Economides J.M.
        • Graziano F.
        • Tousimis E.
        • et al.
        Expanded algorithm and updated experience with breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty in the large or ptotic breast.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143 (97e): 688e
        • Peled A.W.
        • Sbitany H.
        • Foster R.D.
        • et al.
        Oncoplastic mammoplasty as a strategy for reducing reconstructive complications associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy.
        Breast J. 2014; 20: 302-307
        • Stein M.J.
        • Karir A.
        • Arnaout A.
        • et al.
        Quality-of-life and surgical outcomes for breast cancer patients treated with therapeutic reduction mammoplasty versus mastectomy with immediate reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27: 4502-4512
        • Clough K.B.
        • Kaufman G.J.
        • Nos C.
        • et al.
        Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 1375-1391
        • Chatterjee A.
        • Gass J.
        • Patel K.
        • et al.
        A consensus definition and classification system of oncoplastic surgery developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26: 3436-3444
        • Patel K.
        • Bloom J.
        • Nardello S.
        • et al.
        An oncoplastic surgery primer: common indications, techniques, and complications in Level I and 2 volume displacement oncoplastic surgery.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2019; 26: 3063-3070
        • Strong B.
        • Hall-Findlay E.J.
        How does volume of resection relate to symptom relief for reduction mammaplasty patients?.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2015; 75: 376-382
        • Acea-Nebril B.
        • Cereijo-Garea C.
        • Garcia-Novoa A.
        • et al.
        The role of oncoplastic breast reduction in the conservative management of breast cancer: complications, survival, and quality of life.
        J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115: 679-686
        • Denis-Katz H.S.
        • Ghaedi B.B.
        • Fitzpatrick A.
        • et al.
        Oncological safety, surgical outcome, and patient satisfaction of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with contralateral balancing reduction mammoplasty.
        Plast Surg (Oakv). 2021; 29: 235-242
        • Patel K.
        • Hannah C.M.
        • Gatti M.E.
        • et al.
        A head-to-head comparison of quality of life and aesthetic outcomes following immediate, staged-immediate, and delayed oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 2167-2175
        • Di Micco R.
        • O’Connell R.L.
        • Barry P.A.
        • et al.
        Standard wide local excision or bilateral reduction mammoplasty in large-breasted women with small tumours: surgical and patient-reported outcomes.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43: 636-641
        • Prabhakar R.
        • Rath G.K.
        • Julka P.K.
        • et al.
        Breast dose heterogeneity in CT-based radiotherapy treatment planning.
        J Med Phys. 2008; 33: 43-48
        • Fernando I.N.
        • Ford H.T.
        • Powles T.J.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting acute skin toxicity in patients having breast irradiation after conservative surgery: a prospective study of treatment practice at the Royal Marsden Hospital.
        Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1996; 8: 226-233
        • Losken A.
        • Pinell-White X.
        • Hart A.M.
        • et al.
        The oncoplastic reduction approach to breast conservation therapy: benefits for margin control.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2014; 34: 1185-1191
        • Piper M.L.
        • Esserman L.J.
        • Sbitany H.
        • et al.
        Outcomes following oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty: a systematic review.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 76: S222-S226
        • Losken A.
        • Pinell X.A.
        • Eskenazi B.R.
        The benefits of partial versus total breast reconstruction for women with macromastia.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1051-1056
        • Tong W.M.Y.
        • Baumann D.P.
        • Villa M.T.
        • et al.
        Obese women experience fewer complications after oncoplastic breast repair following partial mastectomy than after immediate total breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137: 777-791
        • Morrow M.
        • Strom E.A.
        • Bassett L.W.
        • et al.
        Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2002; 52: 277-300
        • Masannat Y.A.
        • Agrawal A.
        • Maraqa L.
        • et al.
        Multifocal and multicentric breast cancer, is it time to think again?.
        Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020; 102: 62-66
        • Tan M.P.
        • Sitoh N.Y.
        • Sim A.S.
        Breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancers in women with small-volume breast tissue.
        ANZ J Surg. 2017; 87: E5-E10
        • Kadioglu H.
        • Yucel S.
        • Yildiz S.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of breast conserving surgery in multifocal breast cancers.
        Am J Surg. 2014; 208: 457-464
        • Losken A.
        • Hart A.M.
        • Dutton J.W.
        • et al.
        The expanded use of autoaugmentation techniques in oncoplastic breast surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 10-19
        • Bellizzi A.
        • Vella Baldacchino R.
        • Kazzazi F.
        • et al.
        The successful use of disparate pedicle types for bilateral therapeutic mammaplasties during breast conservation surgery.
        J Surg Case Rep. 2021; 3: rjab064
        • Silverstein M.J.
        • Savalia N.
        • Khan S.
        • et al.
        Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation for patients who need mastectomy.
        Breast J. 2015; 21: 52-59
        • Silverstein M.J.
        • Savalia N.B.
        • Khan S.
        • et al.
        Oncoplastic split reduction with intraoperative radiation therapy.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 3405-3406
        • Savioli F.
        • Seth S.
        • Morrow E.
        • et al.
        Extreme oncoplasty: breast conservation in patients with large, multifocal, and multicentric breast cancer.
        Breast Cancer. 2021; 13 (Dove Med Press): 353-359
        • Koppiker C.B.
        • Noor A.U.
        • Dixit S.
        • et al.
        Extreme oncoplastic surgery for multifocal/multicentric and locally advanced breast cancer.
        Int J Breast Cancer. 2019; : 4262589
        • Tanzini I.
        Spora il mio nuova processo di amputazione della mammella.
        Riforma Med. 1906; 22: 757
        • Koshima I.
        • Soeda S.
        Inferior epigastric artery skin flap without rectus abdominis muscle.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1989; 42: 645
        • Healy C.
        • Allen Sr., R.J.
        The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; 30: 121-125
        • Garvey P.B.
        • Buchel E.W.
        • Pockaj B.A.
        • et al.
        DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 1711-1719
        • Knox A.D.C.
        • Ho A.L.
        • Leung L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-year clinical retrospective study and literature review.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 16-28
        • Haddock N.T.
        • Cho M.J.
        • Gassman A.
        • et al.
        Stacked profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in failed or unavailable deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143 (94e): 488e
        • Granzow J.W.
        • Levine J.L.
        • Chiu E.S.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 614-621
        • Godbout E.
        • Farmer L.
        • Bortoluzzi P.
        • et al.
        Donor-site morbidity of the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction in teenagers.
        Can J Plast Surg. 2013; 21: 19-22
        • Mirzabeigi M.
        • Au A.
        • Jandali S.
        • et al.
        Trials and tribulations with the inferior gluteal artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128 (24e): 614e
        • Largo R.D.
        • Chu C.K.
        • Chang E.I.
        • et al.
        Perforator mapping of the profunda artery perforator flap: anatomy and clinical experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 1135-1145
        • Qian B.
        • Xiong L.
        • Li J.
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis on microsurgical safety and efficacy of profunda artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction.
        J Oncol. 2019; 29: 9506720
        • Allen Jr., R.J.
        • Lee Z.
        • Mayo J.L.
        • et al.
        The profunda artery perforator flap experience for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 968-975
        • Atzeni M.
        • Salzillo R.
        • Haywood R.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap: technical refinements and evolution, outcomes, and patient satisfaction based on 116 consecutive flaps.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 75: 1617-1624
        • Martinez C.A.
        • Fairchild B.
        • Secchi-Del Rio R.
        • et al.
        Bilateral outpatient breast reconstruction with stacked DIEP and vertical PAP flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9: e3878
        • Haddock N.T.
        • Suszynski T.M.
        • Teotia S.S.
        Consecutive bilateral breast reconstruction using stacked abdominally based and posterior thigh free flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 294-303
        • DellaCroce F.J.
        • Sullivan S.K.
        • Trahan C.
        Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1093-1099
        • Haddock N.T.
        • Cho M.J.
        • Teotia S.S.
        Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single center experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144 (77e): 369e
        • Kanchwala S.
        • Momeni A.
        Hybrid breast reconstruction- the best of both worlds.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: 82-89
        • Scafati S.T.
        • Cavaliere A.
        • Aceto B.
        • et al.
        Combining autologous and prosthetic techniques: the breast reconstruction scale principle.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5e1602
        • Momeni A.
        • Kanchwala S.
        Hybrid prepectoral breast reconstruction: a surgical approach that combines the benefits of autologous and implant-based reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1109-1115
        • Lee H.C.
        • Lee J.
        • Park S.H.
        • et al.
        The hybrid latissimus dorsi flap in immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study with the abdominal-based flap.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2021; 86: 394-399
        • Bach A.D.
        • Morgenstern I.H.
        • Horch R.E.
        Secondary “hybrid reconstruction” concept with silicone implants after autologous breast reconstruction: is it safe and reasonable?.
        Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26: e921329
        • Chirappapha P.
        • Srichan P.
        • Lertsithichai P.
        • et al.
        Nipple-areola complex sensation after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6: e1716
        • Dossett L.A.
        • Lowe J.
        • Sun W.
        • et al.
        Prospective evaluation of skin and nipple-areola sensation and patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114: 11-16
        • Djohan R.
        • Gage E.
        • Gatherwright J.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 818-829
        • Boswell E.N.
        • Dizon D.S.
        Breast cancer and sexual function.
        Transl Androl Urol. 2015; 4: 160-168
        • Faulkner H.R.
        • Colwell A.S.
        • Liao E.C.
        • et al.
        Thermal injury to reconstructed breasts from commonly used warming devices: a risk for reconstructive failure.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e1033
        • Seth R.
        • Lamyman M.J.
        • Athanassopoulos A.
        • et al.
        Too close for comfort: accidental burn following subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction.
        J R Soc Med. 2008; 101: 39-40
        • Peled A.W.
        • Amara D.
        • Piper M.L.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of a nipple-specific scale for the BREAST-Q to assess patient-reported outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 1010-1017
        • Slezak S.
        • McGibbon B.
        • Dellon A.L.
        The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap: return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1992; 28: 210-217
        • Blondeel P.N.
        • Demuynck M.
        • Mete D.
        • et al.
        Sensory nerve repair in perforator flaps for autologous breast reconstruction: sensational or senseless?.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 37-44
        • Spiegel A.J.
        • Menn Z.K.
        • Eldor L.
        • et al.
        Breast reinnervation: DIEP neurotization using the third anterior intercostal nerve.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013; 1: e72
        • Beugels J.
        • Bijkerk E.
        • Lataster A.
        • et al.
        Nerve coaptation improves the sensory recovery of the breast in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148: 273-284
      1. (Available at:) (Accessed 6.1.22)
        • Momeni A.
        • Meyer S.
        • Shefren K.
        • et al.
        Flap neurotization in breast reconstruction with nerve allografts: 1-year clinical outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9: e3328
        • Ducic I.
        • Yoon J.
        • Momeni A.
        • et al.
        Anatomical considerations to optimize sensory recovery in breast neurotization with allograft.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6: e1985
        • Gatherwright J.
        • Knackstedt R.
        • Djohan R.
        Anatomic targets for breast reconstruction neurotization: past results and future possibilities.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 82: 207-212
        • Peled A.W.
        • Peled Z.M.
        Nerve preservation and allografting for sensory innervation following immediate implant breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2332
      2. Peled AW, Peled ZM. Sensory reinnervation after mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction. Ann Breast Surg. Submitted for publication.

        • Djohan R.
        • Scomacao I.
        • Knackstedt R.
        • et al.
        Neurotization of the nipple-areola complex during implant-based reconstruction: evaluation of early sensation recovery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 250-254
        • Tevlin R.
        • Brazio P.
        • Tran N.
        • et al.
        Immediate targeted nipple-areolar complex re-innervation: improving outcomes in immediate autologous breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74: 1503-1507
        • Tsangaris E.
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Kaur M.N.
        • et al.
        Development and psychometric validation of the BREAST-Q sensation module for women undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 7842-7853
        • Vartanian E.D.
        • Lo A.Y.
        • Hershenhouse K.S.
        • et al.
        The role of neurotization in autologous breast reconstruction: can reconstruction restore breast sensation?.
        J Surg Oncol. 2021; 123: 1215-1231
        • Weissler J.M.
        • Koltz P.F.
        • Carney M.J.
        • et al.
        Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 550-565